Mudge Porter Lundeen & Seguin, S.C.

Barry is great!

This place was great. Got to talk to a lawyer right away. Michael Baker was awesome went above and beyond to help me out and point me in the right direction.

Joe Schlitz helped me out with some legal navigation. Had some great results and appreciate their expertise.

Rose Allen was my attorney back in 2021-2022, it was a child custody case and let me tell you, this woman fought for us the whole way, Rose is kind and thoughtful. She doesn’t treat you like you’re just another case, she takes pride in her job and does it with precision. Our case went in every way we hoped and dreamed it would and we couldn’t have done that without Rose. I would highly recommend this law firm, I recommend Rose Allen to everyone I know in need of legal advice. Thank you for helping me and my son. 🙏

Do not give your money to this company. Stole my money $300 an hour. If you pay hourly your case does not matter to them in my opinion.. court date after court date I said no deal I want to go to trial.. months go by I'm already ready for trial. He calls and says Nick we're not going to trial every we got everything worked out.. I trusted him with my $300 an hour. He worked with the da to convict me and denied me my 6th amendment right. If you're stressed your hair is turning grey you're worried you're sick they don't care. After court they brag that they work together every day and this is what they do. Cowards.

DONT GET THIS LAW FIRM.

Wish he would have told me before I paid him that I didn't have a case. Not their fault that the justice system is rigged but it would've been nice knowing that before I gave him all my money and get the same turn out that the public defender had offered me for 60$

Save your money and your freedom by looking elsewhere

Very helpful and reasonably priced.

I have had 3 instances in my life where I needed legal counsel and advice. All occurred with Mudge, Porter, Lundeen & Seguin. In each situation it was absolutely the right choice.

Prior to a scheduled consultation, it had been communicated over the phone that there would be no conceivable reason for a viable potential case to be turned away by their law office. Upon having the in person consult, pertinent critical summarizing documentation (a single page) was refused to be reviewed by the attorney. The attorney that had been met with floated the idea and requested that a polygraph be taken prior to the case potentially going to trial or even being formally requested. Upon communicating to the attorney of the inherent unreliability of polygraph results, representation for the misdemeanor level case was turned down by the office.

Barry is very pleasant to work with He is a SUPER attorney. The staff that they have are very experienced. No disappointments here.

Above and beyond’!! Joel Schlitz is an excellent Attorney. Professional, driven and most importantly, honorable. Highly recommend this firm.

UPDATE: I appreciate the response from this business and here is my response. In the process of finding an estate attorney, at the time I wrote the original review, I came across the listing for this attorneys office. Reminded of my past experience and I felt it was appropriate to write a review stating just the facts of my experience at the time. I also remember not feeling comfortable writing a review at the time of my experience fearing some form of retaliation. Just stating the facts. ORIGINAL Review: I can only speak for what I experienced. Meet with Jonathan Lundeen and planned on setting up a retainer. Asked him to review some documents. After a couple weeks hearing nothing from Mr Lundeen and few phone calls he never returned I stopped by and picked up my documents. Mr Porter acted as the county arbitrator between an insurance company and I for a small claims case. My decision to settle was base on Mr Porter's recommendation. After signing the settlement documents Mr Porter began promoting his arbitration services to the insurance companies attorney. Displaying a potential conflict of interest. So was his recommendation skewed by his concern for promoting his arbitration services or was he recommending the best interest of BOTH parties?